Sender
Who claims to have sent it.
Email remains one of the main communication channels among employees, customers, suppliers, and partners — and a digital identity frequently used to establish trust.
That trust needs protection.
Add Solution designs and implements email security architectures combining protection against phishing, malware, spoofing, and abuse; domain authentication with SPF, DKIM, and DMARC; message analysis; and integration with identity, endpoints, and security monitoring.
Estruturamos proteção de e-mail com SPF, DKIM, DMARC, gateway, identidade e resposta para reduzir fraude sem interromper fluxos legítimos.

Arquitetura, execução e operação tratadas como partes da mesma responsabilidade.
A delivery decision can combine different signals, depending on the platform. Email security should not depend on a single check.
Who claims to have sent it.
Which digital identity is being used.
SPF, DKIM and DMARC alignment.
History and context when available.
Text, URLs and attachments.
Conditions for delivery or processing.
Social engineering, context spoofing, links, attachments, requests, fake pages, and credential theft exploit human decisions.
When the target is human judgment, security must combine technology, context, and process.
Impersonation, lookalike domains, compromised accounts, financial requests, false urgency, and trusted relationships can all play a role in BEC.
Not every threat arrives as a malicious file. Some arrive as an apparently legitimate request.
Authentication, reputation, domain analysis, context and policies help assess a message, depending on the platform.
Domain analysis, display names, context, behavior and policies can produce signals, without guaranteeing detection of every form of abuse.
SPF connects the domain, DNS policy, and authorized senders. Inventory, third-party services, and maintenance are essential; SPF alone does not prevent spoofing or phishing.
A cryptographic signature, selector, and public key in DNS enable validation according to the configuration.
DKIM adds evidence of authenticity and integrity to the message.
The none, quarantine and reject policies and DMARC reports need to be adopted according to the inventory and maturity level.
DMARC should not necessarily start at reject. First, we need to understand who actually sends email on behalf of the organization.
SPF, DKIM, DMARC, inventory, authorized third parties, monitoring, and DNS help reduce domain misuse.
Protecting the inbox is part of the problem. We must also protect what third parties receive in your company's name.
IP and domain reputation, behavior, lists, and history can add context to inbound and outbound traffic.
Protect what comes in and preserve trust in what goes out.
Reputation checks, categorization, URL rewriting, click-time protection and analysis may be available, depending on the platform.
File type, reputation, signatures, behavior, policies and sandboxing where supported can help assess processes, connections and changes, without guaranteeing complete detection.
A file may appear legitimate by its name. Analysis must consider more than the extension.
Blocking the message is an opportunity for prevention. Detecting what may have passed through requires additional controls.
Endpoint Security (EDR/XDR) Backup & Disaster RecoveryCredentials, MFA, identity, sessions, access, and compromised mailboxes require their own controls.
Content security protects communication. Identity security protects whoever controls the account.Zero Trust & Secure Access
Microsoft 365, Google Workspace and other platforms can combine native controls, gateways, APIs, identity and telemetry, depending on the environment.
CloudOn-premises environments, cloud environments, external gateways, relays and third-party services can form different chains.
DNS, MX, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, SMTP, TLS, reputation, queue, policy, relay, routing, and quarantine all play a role in diagnostics.
Diagnosing email requires understanding the entire delivery chain.
TLS, certificates and opportunistic or mandatory use according to the architecture protect SMTP communications in transit, without being equivalent to end-to-end encryption.
Addressing compromised accounts, outbound spam and malware through policies, reputation management, abuse controls, limits and monitoring helps preserve domain and IP trust.
Content, attachments, patterns, classification, recipients and policies can be assessed by DLP where supported.
Decisions can combine signals without advocating indiscriminate aggressive blocking.
Tuning, justified allowlists, policies, reputation, logs, analysis, exceptions, and monitoring preserve communication.
A mature policy must provide protection without turning protection into unavailability.
Sender, recipient, timestamp, message ID, headers, authentication results, action, URL, attachment, policy, and gateway produce evidence according to availability.
Logs turn a suspicious message into investigable evidence.SIEM & Security Analytics
Correlation depends on existing integrations and does not automatically confirm an incident.
Endpoint Security (EDR/XDR)We discover, map, validate, and relate authentication, flow, protection, and operation.
A strong policy without an inventory can also block those who should be authorized to send.
More than 15 years of experience connecting DNS, SMTP, email, identity, endpoint, firewall, cloud, SIEM, and operations.
Domains, platforms and flows.
Authorized senders and third parties.
SPF, DKIM and DMARC.
Messages, links and attachments.
Signals, reputation and behavior.
Identity, endpoint and SIEM.
Logs, queues and decisions.
Reduce noise and preserve communication.
Monitor changes and risks.
The platform filters messages. Engineering protects identity, domain, flow, and communication.
Vendors and platforms belong on technology pages. The solution begins with the trust that communication needs to preserve.
Cybersecurity Technologies & ProductsRespostas objetivas para dúvidas técnicas e operacionais que costumam surgir antes de um projeto.
Não. SPF declara servidores autorizados para um domínio, mas precisa integrar-se a outros sinais e controles.
Não. DKIM permite validar uma assinatura associada ao domínio; não prova a identidade pessoal do remetente.
Não necessariamente. Inventário, observação, correção de SPF/DKIM e validação de alinhamento devem orientar o aumento progressivo de enforcement.
Não. MFA fortalece autenticação, mas precisa fazer parte de uma estratégia mais ampla de identidade e segurança.
Não. Segurança de e-mail e Endpoint Security protegem partes diferentes e complementares da cadeia.
Share the context of your environment, the perceived impacts and the results your organization seeks. Add Solution will direct the conversation to the most appropriate experts.